Wondering which is better, Veo 3.1 or Sora 2? On Media.io,
you can access Google Veo 3.1 and OpenAI Sora 2 in one place-switch models, compare results, and ship faster.
Veo 3.1 (Google) emphasizes cinematic control, synchronized sound, and improved realism/physics with multi-shot chaining-now with 1080p support and vertical formats in the Veo 3 family.
Sora 2 (OpenAI) focuses on ultra-realistic motion and physics, synchronized audio, and a consumer app experience.
Try both on Media.io and pick your winner.
Below we compare Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2 across video generation specs, real-world prompt fidelity, audio, pricing, and overall value-so you can decide what is the difference between Veo 3.1 and Sora 2 and which is better for your project.
Dimension | Veo 3.1 (Google) | Sora 2 (OpenAI) |
---|---|---|
Video specs | Family supports 1080p and 9:16 vertical via Gemini API (Veo 3/3 Fast; Veo 3.1 builds on this), with synchronized audio; multi-shot chaining via Flow workflows. 1080p currently confirmed for 16:9 in API. | App-based generation with synchronized sound; widely reported lengths around 15s (free) and up to ~25s (Pro) per clip during rollout. Invite-based access; Android pre-registration and iOS launch noted. |
Prompt fidelity & physics | Strong adherence to camera moves, subject continuity, and scene logic; improved physics & identity consistency vs prior gen (Veo 3). | Emphasizes realism and physics accuracy; highly detailed short scenes with robust motion fidelity. |
Audio & lip-sync | Native audio generation and better sync; part of Veo 3 family improvements exposed in Gemini. | Synchronized dialogue, effects, and music are core features of Sora 2. |
Pricing (official/public) | Reported Gemini API price cut: Veo 3 ≈ $0.40/s, Veo 3 Fast ≈ $0.15/s (previously $0.75/s). Vertex/Gemini pages don’t list per-sec tables directly. | OpenAI has not published granular Sora 2 per-second API pricing. Access is via Sora app (invite) and may be included with certain ChatGPT paid tiers; exact limits vary and aren’t fully public. |
Overall value | High value for narrative + control with audio; flexible aspect ratios; integrates into Google Gemini/Flow pipelines. | Excellent for short, high-realism clips; strong consumer UX; evolving availability (invite rollouts). |
Don’t choose blindly-openai sora 2 vs google veo 3.1 side-by-side on Media.io, then pick what fits your brand style and workflow.
Veo 3.1 emphasizes cinematic control, multi-shot chaining and native audio within Google’s Gemini/Flow stack; Sora 2 emphasizes ultra-realistic short clips with synchronized dialogue and sound.
For narrative ads/education with aspect flexibility, Veo 3.1 often wins; for short hyper-real shots, Sora 2 shines. The best approach: try both on Media.io.
Veo 3 family supports 9:16 and 1080p in Gemini API (1080p confirmed for 16:9); Veo 3.1 builds on that. Sora 2 supports multiple aspect ratios inside the app; official public spec sheets are still evolving.
Google’s per-second API pricing for Veo 3 reportedly dropped to roughly $0.40/s (Veo 3) and $0.15/s (Veo 3 Fast). OpenAI hasn’t published granular Sora 2 API prices; app access is invite-based and may tie to ChatGPT subscriptions.
Yes-Media.io integrates both engines so you can compare Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2 with your own prompts, then choose the best output.
· Create Viral Videos with the Top 15 Veo 3 Prompts
· Create Viral Videos with the Sora 2 Prompts